Wood v. County of Contra Costa

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedJanuary 8, 2021
Docket3:19-cv-07597
StatusUnknown

This text of Wood v. County of Contra Costa (Wood v. County of Contra Costa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wood v. County of Contra Costa, (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANDREA WOOD, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07597-MMC

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM 9 v. JUDGMENT; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK OF COURT 10 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, et al.,

Defendants. 11

12 13 On October 14, 2020, the Clerk of Court entered judgment on the Court's orders of 14 dismissal as to all claims in plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). Specifically, the 15 Court (1) dismissed plaintiff Andrea Wood's ("Wood") claims without further leave to 16 amend, for failure to a state a claim, and (2) dismissed plaintiff T.P.'s claims without 17 prejudice, for the reason that he is a minor who is not represented by counsel. 18 The Court is in receipt of Wood's "Motion for Relief from Final Judgment, Order of 19 Proceeding," received January 4, 2021, by which Wood, proceeding pro se, seeks relief 20 from the judgment for purposes of filing a Second Amended Complaint.1 21 "[O]nce judgment has been entered in a case, a motion to amend the complaint 22 can be entertained only if the judgment is first reopened under a motion brought under 23 Rule 59 or 60." Lindauer v. Rogers, 91 F.3d 1355, 1357 (9th Cir. 1996). In her motion, 24 Wood seeks relief from the judgment under Rule 60. Wood fails, however, to identify any 25 cognizable reason for granting relief from the judgment. 26

27 1 Although Wood has not submitted a proposed SAC, she has described, in the 1 Accordingly, Wood's motion for relief is hereby DENIED. 2 Lastly, as the motion is supported by 193 pages of documents, collectively titled 3 || "Exhibits to Rule 60 Motion," that are replete with material not properly filed in the public 4 record, see Fed. R. Civ. 5.2(a), and that the Court finds are properly filed under seal 5 || without redaction, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(d), the Clerk of Court is hereby DIRECTED to 6 || file said Exhibits under seal. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 || Dated: January 8, 2021 . INE M. CHESNEY 10 United States District Judge 11 12

13 ©

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wood v. County of Contra Costa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-county-of-contra-costa-cand-2021.