Wood v. Cole

Supreme Court of Georgia

Wood v. Cole

290 S.E.2d 927, 249 Ga. 389

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 29, 1982

Docket38141

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 290 S.E.2d 927 (Wood v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wood v. Cole, 290 S.E.2d 927, 249 Ga. 389 (Ga. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

It is undisputed that the issues raised in this appeal are moot. While we agree with appellants’ argument that there are issues “capable of repetition yet evading review” (see Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U. S. 368, 373 (99 SC 2898, 61 LE2d 608) (1979), we also find that the record in this case is such that we are unable to adequately consider the issues.

It is therefore the judgment of this court that the case be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Weltner, J., who is disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

It is undisputed that the issues raised in this appeal are moot. While we agree with appellants’ argument that there are issues “capable of repetition yet evading review” (see Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U. S. 368, 373 (99 SC 2898, 61 LE2d 608) (1979), we also find that the record in this case is such that we are unable to adequately consider the issues.

It is therefore the judgment of this court that the case be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Weltner, J., who is disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 S.E.2d 927, 249 Ga. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-cole-ga-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack