Wood v. Brighton Mills

297 F. 594, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2863
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 13, 1924·No. Nos. 3066, 3092·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After reading the records in these cases and carefully considering the questions discussed in the accompanying briefs, we find ourselves everywhere in accord with the reasoning and conclusions of the learned trial judge. Important as are the questions raised and large as are the sums at stake, a recital of the extended correspondence between the parties on which the cases mainly turn” and a discussion of the questions of law growing out of it would, we think, involve merely a repetition of the reasoning of the learned trial judge, and ¡would add nothing to the decisions. We shall therefore affirm the judgments on his opinions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. Brighton Mills, 297 F. 594, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2863 (3d Cir. 1924).

297 F. 594 (Wood v. Brighton Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brookridge Farm, Inc. v. United States
27 F. Supp. 909 (D. Colorado, 1939)
Luster v. Hutchens
60 F.2d 751 (Eighth Circuit, 1932)