Wood v. Amer
739 A.2d 265, 251 Conn. 908, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 372
This text of 739 A.2d 265 (Wood v. Amer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wood v. Amer, 739 A.2d 265, 251 Conn. 908, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 372 (Colo. 1999).
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 601 (AC 18410), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) the ‘Brush deed’ contained two separate restrictive covenants, and that, therefore, the grantor intended that only one house was to be located on either lot 10 or lot 11; and (2) the statute of limitations contained in General Statutes § 52-575a had not expired with respect to the plaintiffs claim of a violation of a covenant not to build?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wood v. Amer
755 A.2d 175 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
739 A.2d 265, 251 Conn. 908, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-v-amer-conn-1999.