Wood v. Amer

739 A.2d 265, 251 Conn. 908, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 372

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 601 (AC 18410), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1) the ‘Brush deed’ contained two separate restrictive covenants, and that, therefore, the grantor intended that only one house was to be located on either lot 10 or lot 11; and (2) the statute of limitations contained in General Statutes § 52-575a had not expired with respect to the plaintiffs claim of a violation of a covenant not to build?”

Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., Deborah S. Gordon and Mario R. Borelli, in opposition. Decided October 6, 1999