Wood & Bros. v. Winship Machine Co.

83 Ala. 424
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1887·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The action is founded on a written instrument, ascertaining the plaintiff’s demand, and the judgment is one by. default. The note obligates the maker to pay principal, interest, and ten per-cent, attorney's fees. This we construe to mean, ten per-cent, on the amount of the note, as attorney’s fees in any suit brought to enforce its collection. Such a demand will support a judgment by default, for the entire amount due, including the attorney’s fees, without the intervention of a jury. — Code, 1886, §2740; McKenzie v. Clanton, 33 Ala. 528; Burns v. Howard, 68 Ala. 352. It is not a case of recovery for a mere penalty stipulated to be paid by written promise, as in McPherson v. Robertson, 82 Ala. 459, where it was held error to render judgment by default without writ of inquiry by a jury to determine the amount of damages.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood & Bros. v. Winship Machine Co., 83 Ala. 424 (Ala. 1887).

83 Ala. 424 (Wood & Bros. v. Winship Machine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Government Street Lumber Co. v. AmSouth Bank, NA
553 So. 2d 68 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)
Smith v. Combustion Resources Engineering, Inc.
431 So. 2d 1249 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. Waugh
78 F.2d 325 (Fourth Circuit, 1935)
Vinyard v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.
87 So. 552 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Raleigh County Bank v. Poteet
82 S.E. 332 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1914)
Stephenson v. Allison
123 Ala. 439 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Ledbetter & Co. v. Vinton
108 Ala. 644 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
Williams v. Flowers
90 Ala. 136 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)