Wood-Barker Co. v. Van Clief

107 N.Y.S. 88
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 29, 1907·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff failed to show that the person with whom the oral agreement for the purchase involved in this action was made had authority from the defendant to enter into the contract, and the judgment must therefore be reversed.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood-Barker Co. v. Van Clief, 107 N.Y.S. 88 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

107 N.Y.S. 88 (Wood-Barker Co. v. Van Clief) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.