Wood-Barker Co. v. Van Clief
107 N.Y.S. 88
This text of 107 N.Y.S. 88 (Wood-Barker Co. v. Van Clief) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wood-Barker Co. v. Van Clief, 107 N.Y.S. 88 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
Opinion
The plaintiff failed to show that the person with whom the oral agreement for the purchase involved in this action was made had authority from the defendant to enter into the contract, and the judgment must therefore be reversed.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
107 N.Y.S. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wood-barker-co-v-van-clief-nyappterm-1907.