Woo Shing v. Fluckey

Sixth Circuit

Woo Shing v. Fluckey

250 F. 598, 162 C.C.A. 614, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1935

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 12, 1918·No. No. 2882·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of this case having been continued until the Supreme Court should answer the questions certified to it by this court in the matter of United States v. Woo Jan (No. 3025) 250 Fed. 597, - C. C. A. —, and such questions having now been answered, as appears by the mandate of that court filed in this court in the matter of United States v. Woo Jan (No. 3025) 245 U. S. 552, 38 Sup. Ct. 207, 62 L. Ed. -, from which mandate [599] it appears that the Department of Labor had no jurisdiction to issue the warrant under which Woo Shing was held:

Ordered, that the order of the District Court be reversed and vacated, and the cause be remanded, with instructions that Woo Shing be discharged from custody.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The decision of this case having been continued until the Supreme Court should answer the questions certified to it by this court in the matter of United States v. Woo Jan (No. 3025) 250 Fed. 597, - C. C. A. —, and such questions having now been answered, as appears by the mandate of that court filed in this court in the matter of United States v. Woo Jan (No. 3025) 245 U. S. 552, 38 Sup. Ct. 207, 62 L. Ed. -, from which mandate [599] it appears that the Department of Labor had no jurisdiction to issue the warrant under which Woo Shing was held:

Ordered, that the order of the District Court be reversed and vacated, and the cause be remanded, with instructions that Woo Shing be discharged from custody.

Woo Shing v. Fluckey, 250 F. 598, 162 C.C.A. 614, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1935 (6th Cir. 1918).

Pincite

250 F. 598 (Woo Shing v. Fluckey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related