Wonzer v. Hernandez

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 2022
Docket1:20-cv-10836
StatusUnknown

This text of Wonzer v. Hernandez (Wonzer v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wonzer v. Hernandez, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

tacopina seigel trial lawyers SEIGEL & DEOREO 275 Madison Avenue, 35th Floor MATTHEW G. DEOREO New York, NY 10016 EMAIL: mdeoreo@tacopinalaw.com Telephone (212) 227-8877 www.tacopinalaw.com Facsimile (212} 619-1028

February 1, 2022 Hon. John P. Cronan U.S. District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Room 1320 New York, NY 10007 Re: Wonzer y. Hernandez, 1:20-cv-10836 (S.D.N.Y.) Dear Judge Cronan: Tam counsel for Plaintiffs in the above-referenced action and respectfully submit this letter motion pursuant to Your Honor’s Individual Rules and Practices with regard to Plaintiffs’ inquest submissions that are due on February 11, 2022. Specifically, pursuant to Rule 4, we respectfully request that the parties be granted leave to file certain papers under seal. Defendant has consented to this request. First, we request that the parties be permitted to file Plaintiffs’ medical records under seal. See Gutierrez vy. Dubois, No. 20 CIV. 2079 (PGG), 2020 WL 3072242, at #10 (S.D.N.Y. June 10, 2020)(“Respondents have moved to file under seal Petitioner’s medical records. These records are judicial documents because they are relevant to whether Petitioner has a serious medical need. Accordingly, they are subject to a presumption of access. This presumption of access is outweighed here by Petitioner’ s considerable privacy interest in his sensitive medical information, however. The motion to seal will therefore be granted.” )(quotations and citations omitted); United States v. Madoff, 465 F. Supp. 3d 343, 352 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)(“His motion to seal medical records submitted as Exhibit D, made by counsel’s letter dated February 5, 2020 (Doc. 213), is GRANTED.”); Tardif v. City of New York, 344 F. Supp. 3d 579, 611 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)(“Tardif’s motion to seal her medical records (ECF No. 219) is GRANTED.”). Second, we request that the parties be permitted to file tax returns and bank statements of Defendant and his companies under seal. See Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Payton, No. 14 CIV, 4644, 2016 WL 3023151, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 16, 2016)(“The defendants, also at the Court’s direction,

TACOPINA SEIGEL & DEOREO

Hon. John P. Cronan February 1, 2022 Page 2

submitted in formation [sic] on the irfinances [sic]: Mr. Payton provideda [sic] financial statement, and Mr. Durant provided his 2015 tax return. These submissions will be docketed under seal.”); Adams v. New York State Educ. Dep’t, 959 F. Supp. 2d 517, 519 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)(“The Court then ordered Penkovsky to file documents under seal, including prior federal and state tax returns, for the Court to evaluate his ability to pay the Sanction.”).

Matthew G. DeOreo

ce: All Counsel by ECF Letter Motion GRANTED. The parties are granted leave to file certain papers under seal. SO ORDERED.

. ref Willis United States Magistrate Judge February 9, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tardif v. City of N.Y.
344 F. Supp. 3d 579 (S.D. Illinois, 2018)
Adams v. New York State Education Department
959 F. Supp. 2d 517 (S.D. New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wonzer v. Hernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wonzer-v-hernandez-nysd-2022.