Wong Wing Sing v. Nagle

299 F. 601, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3112
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 27, 1924·No. No. 4215·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellants thus state their case:

“This is not the case of a Chinese person applying for admission into the United States for the first time upon the claim that he is a native born citizen; but it is the case of a Chinese person who had been regularly admitted into the United States as a native-born citizen, who had established a residence in the United States, who had not abandoned his residence, who left the United States for a temporary visit to China, and who upon his return applied for admission as a resident citizen of the United States, and supported his claim by proofs which showed that his claim was not frivolous.”

Under these facts, the appellants contend that they were entitled to a judicial hearing on the question of citizenship. In answer to a similar contention, in Ex parte Yoshimasa Nomura, 297 Fed. 191, this court said:

“The appellant makes the point that he was entitled to a judicial hearing on the question of his citizenship. But the appellant is in the position of one who is stopped at the border seeking to enter the country, and his right is determinable without a judicial hearing, or .a hearing other than that which was had.”

The order is affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wong Wing Sing v. Nagle, 299 F. 601, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 3112 (9th Cir. 1924).

299 F. 601 (Wong Wing Sing v. Nagle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Ex Rel. Medeiros v. Watkins
166 F.2d 897 (Second Circuit, 1948)
Ex parte Lee Fong Fook
74 F. Supp. 68 (N.D. California, 1948)
Wong Kam Chong v. United States
111 F.2d 707 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
Ex parte Fong Chow Oi
15 F.2d 209 (N.D. California, 1926)