Wong v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: February 1, 2022
• Docket: 2:20-cv-02086
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8! KURT WONG, Case No. 2:20-cv-02086-APG-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), Order 10] v. [Docket No. 28] Il] WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend the dispositive motion deadline to 30 14! days after the parties’ settlement conference. Docket No. 28. The parties represent that discovery 15] is completed and that they do not seek to reopen any discovery deadlines.! For good cause shown, 16] the stipulation is hereby GRANTED. The dispositive motion deadline is RESET for May 20, 17} 2022. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: February 1, 2022

Nancy J. Koppe 21 United States’Magistrate Judge 22

23 24, ———______ ' The outer deadline for filing discovery motions is (in this District) the deadline for dispositive motions. Garcia v. Serv. Emps. Int’l Union, 332 F.R.D. 351, 354 (D. Nev. 2019) (citing Gault v. Nabisco Biscuit Co., 184 F.R.D. 620, 622 (D. Nev. 1999)). Although the stipulation is 26] not entirely clear on this issue, it appears based on the representations that there will be no discovery motions filed in this case. The Court is allowing the relief sought of extending the 27|| dispositive motion deadline contingent on this understanding that the parties will not file any discovery motions. Hence, the Court is extending the deadline for filing dispositive motions, but 28] it is not extending the deadline for filing discovery motions.