Wong v. Wong

86 A.D.3d 439, 926 N.Y.2d 288
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 7, 2011·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[440] Defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing that the fully executed prenuptial agreement at issue was ever delivered to him, thus such agreement was neither valid nor binding (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [3]; Ross v Ross, 233 App Div 626, 637 [1931], affd 262 NY 381 [1933]; 219 Broadway Corp. v Alexander’s, Inc., 46 NY2d 506 [1979]; Alsaedi v Ninth Ave. Realty, 2 AD3d 233 [2003]).

Moreover, defendant failed to meet his burden to prove the terms of any valid prenuptial agreement between the parties because no document purporting to be a true and accurate copy of the prenuptial agreement’s terms was entered into evidence (see Schozer v William Penn Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 84 NY2d 639, 645 [1994]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Catterson, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wong v. Wong, 86 A.D.3d 439, 926 N.Y.2d 288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

86 A.D.3d 439 (Wong v. Wong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weiss v. Phillips
2017 NY Slip Op 8209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
76-82 St. Marks, LLC v. Gluck
2017 NY Slip Op 1329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)