Wong v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wong v. State

843 So. 2d 1029, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6665, 2003 WL 21012536

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 2003

DocketNo. 3D03-803

StatusPublished

This text of 843 So. 2d 1029 (Wong v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wong v. State, 843 So. 2d 1029, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6665, 2003 WL 21012536 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. The transcript of the plea colloquy from August 12, 1999, unequivocally demonstrates that the trial court explicitly informed defendant that by accepting the plea, he could face deportation. Accordingly, defendant’s postconviction claim was untimely filed and no evi-dentiary hearing was required.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. The transcript of the plea colloquy from August 12, 1999, unequivocally demonstrates that the trial court explicitly informed defendant that by accepting the plea, he could face deportation. Accordingly, defendant’s postconviction claim was untimely filed and no evi-dentiary hearing was required.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

843 So. 2d 1029, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6665, 2003 WL 21012536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wong-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.