WONG

12 I. & N. Dec. 407

• Court: Board of Immigration Appeals
• Decided: July 1, 1967
• Docket: 1778
• Status: Published

Opinion

Interim Decision #1778

MATTER or Woo

In Exclusion Proceedings A-10096314 Decided by Board September 7, 1967 Jurisdiction to consider an application for adjustment of status under section 245, Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, by an alien excluded and paroled into the United States, who has not been served with an order to show cause or a warrant of arrest, lies with the District Director (8 CFR 245.2(a) ). EXCLUDED : ACt of 1824—NO immigration visa. Executive Order No. 8706—No passport. ON BEHALF OF APPELLANT • ON BEHALF OF SERVICE: Elmer Erica, Maguire Allan A. Shader 515 Madison Avenue Trial Attorney New York. New York 10022 Brief filed) (Brief filed)

The case comes forward on motion of counsel dated March 29, 1967 requesting that the "deportation" proceeding 1 be reopened to allow the respondent to apply for the privilege of adjustment of status un- der section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended. The new facts set forth are that since the entry of the final order herein, a relative visa petition has been approved granting the re- spondent immediate relative status (201 (b) ) ; that the alien is eligible to receive an. immigrant visa and is admissible to the United States for permanent residence and an immigrant visa is immediately avail- able to him at the time his application will be approved; and that he has become, in all respects, eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality 'Act, as amended. This case was previously before us on September 30, 1952 on appeal from an order 'entered by the Acting Assistant Commissioner on May 28, 1952, affirming the appellant's exclusion from the United States by a Board of Special Inquiry on the above-stated grounds. Briefly, the record relates to a native and citizen of China, born February 3, It is assumed that the reference to a deportation proceeding rather than to an exclusion proceeding is an Inadvertent error.

407 Interim Decision #1778 1912, male, married, who arrived at the port of New York on Decem- ber 25, 1951, claiming to be Wong Ling, a son of Wong Wing, a United States citizen. On the basis of the appellant's testimony that he be- lieved himself to be the blood son of Wong Wing and Lee Shee, he was issued a travel affidavit on November 27, 1951 by the American Consul at Hong Kong. However, the findings before a Board of Spe- .cial Inquiry established that the appellant was an adopted son and did not acquire citizenship under the provisions of section 1993 of the Re- vised. Statutes. He was thereupon ordered excluded. Subsequently, on October 10, 1952, an order of parole was entered. A visa petition filed by Connie Wei for immediate relative status under section 201(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, was approved on February 24, 1967. The trial attorney has filed a brief in opposition to the motion to reopen, asserting that under section 245 of the Immigration and Na- tionality Act, the appellant is ineligible for such relief, inasmuch as he has not been inspected and admitted but excluded from the United States on his false claim to citizenship in 1952; thus, he is ineligible for section 245 relief. The alien's counsel has filed a brief claiming that the alien has been paroled into the United States and is therefore eligible under section 245 of the Immigation and Nationality Act; and that a hearing should be held before a special inquiry officer. We believe the matter is covered by regulation, 8 CFR 245.2(a), which provides as follows : Au application for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Act * * by an alien after he ban been served with an order to show cause or a warrant of arrest shall be made and considered only in proceedings under Part 242 of this chapter. In any other ease, an alien who believes that he meets the eligibility requirements of section 245 of the Act * " and section 245.1 shall apply to the district director having jurisdiction over his place of residence. In the present case, an order to show cause or a warrant of arrest has never been issued. Therefore, the consideration of eligibility under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act lies within the jurisdiction of the District Director as provided by the above regula- tion. The motion will be denied. without prejudice to renewal before the District Director. ORDER: It is ordered that the motion to reopen be denied.