Wong Ah Quie v. United States

118 F. 1020, 54 C.C.A. 684, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4632
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 6, 1902
DocketNo. 759
StatusPublished

This text of 118 F. 1020 (Wong Ah Quie v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wong Ah Quie v. United States, 118 F. 1020, 54 C.C.A. 684, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4632 (9th Cir. 1902).

Opinion

HAWLEY, District Judge.

In the face of the repeated decisions of this court, we cannot say that the judgment herein, finding that appellant was born in China, was clearly against the weight of evidence. The further question presented, as to whether or not a Chinese prostitute comes within the term “Chinese laborer,” as used in the acts of congress, was decided in the affirma' tive in the case of Lee Ah Yin v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 116 Fed. 614. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee Ah Yin v. United States
116 F. 614 (Ninth Circuit, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 F. 1020, 54 C.C.A. 684, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wong-ah-quie-v-united-states-ca9-1902.