Wonderlick v. State
This text of 651 So. 2d 822 (Wonderlick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions, and the lifetime revocation of his driver’s license. See Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607 (Fla. 1994); State v. Wright, 546 So.2d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Onesky v. State, 544 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). However, because the parties operated under a misapprehension of the law as to the revocation of appellant’s driver’s license, the affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s filing a motion to withdraw his plea or a rule 3.850 motion. See Gainer v. State, 590 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 So. 2d 822, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2559, 1995 WL 106309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wonderlick-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.