Women's Catholic Order of Foresters v. Krivitz

180 N.W. 819, 173 Wis. 247, 1921 Wisc. LEXIS 19
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 1921
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 N.W. 819 (Women's Catholic Order of Foresters v. Krivitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Women's Catholic Order of Foresters v. Krivitz, 180 N.W. 819, 173 Wis. 247, 1921 Wisc. LEXIS 19 (Wis. 1921).

Opinion

Esci-iweiler, J.

The appellant insists that there was no sufficient legal cause or reason for plaintiff bringing this action, and in any event the several amounts allowed for costs and disbursements and attorney’s fees were each unreasonably large.

The assertion by appellant that he was determined to hold the plaintiff for the amount of the policy and his statement that he would bring an action to recoArer the amount; the assertion by the daughter of her right to the same fund; the length of time that was permitted to elapse after such respective assertions, and the failure of either claimant to institute proceedings, one against the other, or against the plaintiff, whereby the plaintiff might have paid the money into court and have been summarily relie\'ed of liability, fully justified and warranted the plaintiff in bringing the very action that it did.

Furthermore, the appellant, having formally consented that the relief prayed for in the complaint should be granted, is in no position now to be permitted to question the right or propriety of plaintiff instituting the action or being allowed this relief.

The deduction was made solely by reason of the above quoted by-law, a part of plaintiff’s contract with the insured, and the defendants asserting their rights under such contract are necessarily bound by its conditions.

An examination of the record shows no ground for disturbing the conclusion arrived at by the trial court as to the respective amounts of costs and disbursements and attorneys’ fees.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foljahn v. Wiener
289 N.W. 609 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 N.W. 819, 173 Wis. 247, 1921 Wisc. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/womens-catholic-order-of-foresters-v-krivitz-wis-1921.