Womens' Care v. A.G. and P.G.
This text of Womens' Care v. A.G. and P.G. (Womens' Care v. A.G. and P.G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED WOMEN'S CARE FLORIDA, LLC ETC., ET AL.,
Appellants,
v. Case No. 5D15-332
A.G. AND P.G., INDIVIDUALLY, ETC., ET AL,
Appellees. ________________________________/
Opinion filed July 29, 2016
Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Patricia A. Doherty, Judge.
Dinah S. Stein, of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., Miami, Thomas Dukes, III, and Ruth C. Osborne, of McEwan, Martinez & Dukes, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.
Jessie L. Harrell and Bryan S. Gowdy, of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees, A.G. and P.G.
No Appearance for other Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Crespo v. Hernandez, 151 So. 3d 495 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014),
review granted, 171 So. 3d 116 (Fla. 2015). We certify conflict with Santiago v. Baker, 135 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
ORFINGER, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Womens' Care v. A.G. and P.G., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/womens-care-v-ag-and-pg-fladistctapp-2016.