Womeldorf v. Steinbergen

Ohio Supreme Court

Womeldorf v. Steinbergen

1 Wright 41, 1 Ohio Ch. 41

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1832

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Wright 41 (Womeldorf v. Steinbergen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Womeldorf v. Steinbergen, 1 Wright 41, 1 Ohio Ch. 41 (Ohio 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

COLLETT, J.

was of opinion that the challenge could not be received.

WRIGHT, J. was in favor of admitting it. Owing to this division of opinion, the challenge was not received, and the juror was sworn. •

A verdict was taken for the plaintiff for $227.36.

Judges HITCHCOCK and WRIGHT were of opinion the challenge was admissible. Judges COLLETT and LANE were of opinion it was inadmissible.

Owing to this division, the motion for a new trial failed, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI