Womack v. State
This text of 286 S.W.2d 140 (Womack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.
[436]*436The complaint and information were filed on February 14, 1955, and bear the signature of the county attorney.
A motion for arrest of judgment was filed and, upon the hearing on such motion, it was stipulated that the complaint was not signed nor sworn to before the county attorney before it was filed or before the information was filed, and the jurat of such complaint showing that it was signed and sworn to before the county attorney on February 14, 1955, was not true.
In view of such stipulations it is evident that at the time the information was filed and presented, there was no valid complaint which could form a basis for the information. A valid complaint is a prerequisite to a valid information. Art. 415 C.C.P.; Byrom v. State, 158 Tex. Cr. R. 427, 256 S.W. 2d 853.
A complaint sworn to after the information has been presented will not support a conviction. Billingslea v. State, 160 Tex. Cr. Rep. 244„ 268 S.W. 2d 668; Baker v. State, 159 Tex. Cr. R. 491, 265 S.W. 2d 600.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
286 S.W.2d 140, 162 Tex. Crim. 435, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/womack-v-state-texcrimapp-1956.