Womack v. State

286 S.W.2d 140, 162 Tex. Crim. 435, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1236
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 25, 1956·No. No. 27,967·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

[436] The complaint and information were filed on February 14, 1955, and bear the signature of the county attorney.

A motion for arrest of judgment was filed and, upon the hearing on such motion, it was stipulated that the complaint was not signed nor sworn to before the county attorney before it was filed or before the information was filed, and the jurat of such complaint showing that it was signed and sworn to before the county attorney on February 14, 1955, was not true.

In view of such stipulations it is evident that at the time the information was filed and presented, there was no valid complaint which could form a basis for the information. A valid complaint is a prerequisite to a valid information. Art. 415 C.C.P.; Byrom v. State, 158 Tex. Cr. R. 427, 256 S.W. 2d 853.

A complaint sworn to after the information has been presented will not support a conviction. Billingslea v. State, 160 Tex. Cr. Rep. 244„ 268 S.W. 2d 668; Baker v. State, 159 Tex. Cr. R. 491, 265 S.W. 2d 600.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Womack v. State, 286 S.W.2d 140, 162 Tex. Crim. 435, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1236 (Tex. 1956).

286 S.W.2d 140 (Womack v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cadenhead v. State
369 S.W.2d 44 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Marlar v. State
364 S.W.2d 384 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1963)