Womack v. Pollock

Supreme Court of Alabama

Womack v. Pollock

135 So. 919, 223 Ala. 707

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 18, 1931

Docket7 Div. 62.

StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 919 (Womack v. Pollock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Womack v. Pollock, 135 So. 919, 223 Ala. 707 (Ala. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The suit was detinue for a truck that was purchased on a written contract for installment payments.

The court gave the general affirmative charge requested in writing by the plaintiff. McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35, 40, 88 So. 135.

The contract contained the following words: “No warranties expressed or implied have been made by the seller .unless endorsed hereon in writing.”

There were no indorsements to the contrary on the contract. The evidence showed without conflict, that payments were not made as stipulated and that there was no rescission of the contract. There was no error in giving the charge for the plaintiff.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI