Womack v. Barnhart, Comm
This text of 53 F. App'x 678 (Womack v. Barnhart, Comm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dottie M. Womack seeks review of the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to affirm the Commissioner’s denial of social security benefits pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(c), 416.920(c)(2002). Our review of the record discloses that the Commissioner’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea *679 soning of the district court. See Womack v. Barnhart, No. CA-01-59 (W.D.Va. Sept. 16 & 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F. App'x 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/womack-v-barnhart-comm-ca4-2002.