Womack v. Barnhart, Comm
Opinion
Dottie M. Womack seeks review of the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to affirm the Commissioner’s denial of social security benefits pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(c), 416.920(c)(2002). Our review of the record discloses that the Commissioner’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea *679 soning of the district court. See Womack v. Barnhart, No. CA-01-59 (W.D.Va. Sept. 16 & 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
53 F. App'x 678 (Womack v. Barnhart, Comm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.