Wolverine Sign Works v. Powers

227 N.W. 669, 248 Mich. 371, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 568
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 3, 1929·No. Docket No. 82, Calendar No. 34,169.·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

I think the agreement valid, and that Mr. Leo W. Powers may be held to keep it. The *Page 376 statute offers no excuse for releasing him in whole or in part from the agreement. The agreement eliminated competition by Mr. Powers within specified territory but created no monopoly.

The decree is affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.

NORTH, C.J., and FEAD, CLARK, and POTTER, JJ., concurred with WIEST, J. The late Justice FELLOWS took no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolverine Sign Works v. Powers, 227 N.W. 669, 248 Mich. 371, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 568 (Mich. 1929).

227 N.W. 669 (Wolverine Sign Works v. Powers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bar's Products Inc. v. Bars Products International Inc.
662 F. App'x 400 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)
Brillhart v. Danneffel
194 N.W.2d 63 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1971)
Owens v. Hatler
129 N.W.2d 404 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1964)
Hopkins v. Crantz
54 N.W.2d 671 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1952)
Lynch v. Bailey
194 Misc. 280 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Stoia v. Miskinis
298 N.W. 469 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1941)