Wolverine Sign Works v. Powers

Michigan Supreme Court

Wolverine Sign Works v. Powers

227 N.W. 669, 248 Mich. 371, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 568

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 3, 1929

DocketDocket No. 82, Calendar No. 34,169.

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 227 N.W. 669 (Wolverine Sign Works v. Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolverine Sign Works v. Powers, 227 N.W. 669, 248 Mich. 371, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 568 (Mich. 1929).

Pincite

Opinions

I think the agreement valid, and that Mr. Leo W. Powers may be held to keep it. The *Page 376 statute offers no excuse for releasing him in whole or in part from the agreement. The agreement eliminated competition by Mr. Powers within specified territory but created no monopoly.

The decree is affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.

NORTH, C.J., and FEAD, CLARK, and POTTER, JJ., concurred with WIEST, J. The late Justice FELLOWS took no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I think the agreement valid, and that Mr. Leo W. Powers may be held to keep it. The *Page 376 statute offers no excuse for releasing him in whole or in part from the agreement. The agreement eliminated competition by Mr. Powers within specified territory but created no monopoly.

The decree is affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.

NORTH, C.J., and FEAD, CLARK, and POTTER, JJ., concurred with WIEST, J. The late Justice FELLOWS took no part in this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 N.W. 669, 248 Mich. 371, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolverine-sign-works-v-powers-mich-1929.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack