Woltz v. United States
This text of Woltz v. United States (Woltz v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7471
HOWELL W. WOLTZ, TEP,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:09-cv-00209)
Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 8, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Howell W. Woltz, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s orders accepting in part the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition, and denying
reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Woltz v. United
States, No. 5:09-cv-00209 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 30 & Oct. 14,
2010). Further, we deny Woltz’s motion for bail pending appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Woltz v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woltz-v-united-states-ca4-2011.