Woltz v. Bailey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7119

HOWELL W. WOLTZ,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DENNIS BAILEY, individually and in his official capacity; JAMES PENDERGRAPH, individually and in his official capacity; MECKLENBURG COUNTY JAIL,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00211-GCM)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Howell W. Woltz appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Woltz v. Bailey, No. 3:09-cv-00211-GCM (W.D.N.C.

June 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED