Woltin v. Adduci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Woltin v. Adduci

206 A.D.2d 969, 616 N.Y.S.2d 286

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.D.2d 969 (Woltin v. Adduci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woltin v. Adduci, 206 A.D.2d 969, 616 N.Y.S.2d 286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

[970]*970Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondents’ determination that petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 319 (1) is supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, Levitt, J.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[970]*970Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondents’ determination that petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 319 (1) is supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176). (Article 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, Levitt, J.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.D.2d 969, 616 N.Y.S.2d 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woltin-v-adduci-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack