Wolters v. Shraft
67 A. 1103, 70 N.J. Eq. 807, 4 Robb. 807, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 173
Opinion
The deerep appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery hy Vice-Chancellor Stevens.
For affirmance—The Chibe-Justice, Garrison,’ Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayzb, Reed, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, VROOM, GREEN, GRAY, DlLL—14.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wolters v. Shraft, 67 A. 1103, 70 N.J. Eq. 807, 4 Robb. 807, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 173 (N.J. 1906).
67 A. 1103 (Wolters v. Shraft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mott v. Iossa
181 A. 689 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)