Wolters v. Shraft

67 A. 1103, 70 N.J. Eq. 807, 4 Robb. 807, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 173
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The deerep appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery hy Vice-Chancellor Stevens.

For affirmance—The Chibe-Justice, Garrison,’ Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayzb, Reed, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, VROOM, GREEN, GRAY, DlLL—14.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolters v. Shraft, 67 A. 1103, 70 N.J. Eq. 807, 4 Robb. 807, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 173 (N.J. 1906).

67 A. 1103 (Wolters v. Shraft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mott v. Iossa
181 A. 689 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)