Wolstencroft v. Sassower

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wolstencroft v. Sassower

234 A.D.2d 541, 652 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13286

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D.2d 541 (Wolstencroft v. Sassower) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolstencroft v. Sassower, 234 A.D.2d 541, 652 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion by the appellant on appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Westches[542]*542ter County, dated April 4, 1995, April 10, 1995, and July 18, 1995 respectively, inter alia, to transfer the appeals to an Appellate Division in another Department, and cross motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeals and to impose sanctions against the appellant. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 4, 1996, the cross motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the branches of the cross motion which are to dismiss the appeals from the orders dated April 4, 1995, and April 10, 1995, are denied as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that the branch of the cross motion which is to dismiss the appeal from the order dated July 18, 1995, is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the branch of the cross motion which is to impose sanctions against the appellant is denied. Copertino, J. P., Joy, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion by the appellant on appeals from three orders of the Supreme Court, Westches[542]*542ter County, dated April 4, 1995, April 10, 1995, and July 18, 1995 respectively, inter alia, to transfer the appeals to an Appellate Division in another Department, and cross motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeals and to impose sanctions against the appellant. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 4, 1996, the cross motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the cross motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the branches of the cross motion which are to dismiss the appeals from the orders dated April 4, 1995, and April 10, 1995, are denied as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that the branch of the cross motion which is to dismiss the appeal from the order dated July 18, 1995, is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the branch of the cross motion which is to impose sanctions against the appellant is denied. Copertino, J. P., Joy, Krausman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D.2d 541, 652 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolstencroft-v-sassower-nyappdiv-1996.