Wollsteiner v. Ohrbach's, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wollsteiner v. Ohrbach's, Inc.

1 A.D.2d 946, 150 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5679

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 1956·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Determination unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant in this court and in the Appellate Term, the judgment of the Municipal Court vacated and the complaint dismissed, with costs. There was not a sufficient showing of the extent of the alleged dangerous condition to warrant a conclusion without further evidence that defendant had constructive notice of the alleged condition. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Cox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant in this court and in the Appellate Term, the judgment of the Municipal Court vacated and the complaint dismissed, with costs. There was not a sufficient showing of the extent of the alleged dangerous condition to warrant a conclusion without further evidence that defendant had constructive notice of the alleged condition. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Cox, JJ.

Wollsteiner v. Ohrbach's, Inc., 1 A.D.2d 946, 150 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

1 A.D.2d 946 (Wollsteiner v. Ohrbach's, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related