Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Wolkooski v. State

Wolkooski v. State

510 So. 2d 1149, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9808
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 7, 1987
DocketNo. BQ-152
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 510 So. 2d 1149 (Wolkooski v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolkooski v. State, 510 So. 2d 1149, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The only apparent issue for review on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support appellant’s conviction. However, since appellant’s trial counsel did not raise that issue below by filing a motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State’s case and at the close of all of the evidence, a challenge of sufficiency of the evidence cannot be heard on appeal. Compare City of Miami v. Swift, 481 So.2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380.

AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Singletary
883 F. Supp. 1535 (M.D. Florida, 1995)
Ogletree v. State
525 So. 2d 967 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Williams v. State
516 So. 2d 975 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
510 So. 2d 1149, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolkooski-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.