Wolkooski v. State
510 So. 2d 1149, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9808
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 1987·No. No. BQ-152·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The only apparent issue for review on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support appellant’s conviction. However, since appellant’s trial counsel did not raise that issue below by filing a motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State’s case and at the close of all of the evidence, a challenge of sufficiency of the evidence cannot be heard on appeal. Compare City of Miami v. Swift, 481 So.2d 26 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wolkooski v. State, 510 So. 2d 1149, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1915, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
510 So. 2d 1149 (Wolkooski v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Singletary
883 F. Supp. 1535 (M.D. Florida, 1995)
Ogletree v. State
525 So. 2d 967 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Williams v. State
516 So. 2d 975 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)