Wolk v. Widlansky
64 A.2d 230, 1 N.J. 491, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 341
Opinion
The decree under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice Chancellor Jayne in the former Court of Chancery.
For affirmance: Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—6.
For reversal: None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wolk v. Widlansky, 64 A.2d 230, 1 N.J. 491, 1949 N.J. LEXIS 341 (N.J. 1949).
64 A.2d 230 (Wolk v. Widlansky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)