Woliner v. Woliner
344 A.2d 781, 68 N.J. 324, 1975 N.J. LEXIS 146
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for .the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Sohreiber and Judge Conford — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woliner v. Woliner, 344 A.2d 781, 68 N.J. 324, 1975 N.J. LEXIS 146 (N.J. 1975).
344 A.2d 781 (Woliner v. Woliner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Line v. Line
47 Pa. D. & C.3d 83 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1986)
Young v. Young
488 A.2d 264 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Squitieri v. Squitieri
481 A.2d 585 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Kazin v. Kazin
405 A.2d 360 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979)
Mendell v. Mendell
393 A.2d 600 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Chaudry v. Chaudry
388 A.2d 1000 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
Pierrakos v. Pierrakos
372 A.2d 1331 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Woodruffe v. DeMola
368 A.2d 967 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Manfrini v. Manfrini
346 A.2d 430 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)