Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp.

Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp.

180 Misc. 544, 43 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2182
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 18, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 180 Misc. 544 (Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp., 180 Misc. 544, 43 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted, with ten dollars costs to plaintiff to abide the event. In view of the testimony of plaintiff that defendants’ officer requested plaintiff to come and collect his [545]*545wages on the day he quit, plaintiff made out a prima facie case of a hiring at will. If the hiring was at will, plaintiff can recover for the time he actually worked. However, if he agreed to work for a week and quit without justification, he cannot recover. No opinion.

MacCrate, Smith and McCooey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keenan v. Artintype Inc.
145 Misc. 2d 90 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
De Vita v. Rand McNally & Co.
44 Misc. 2d 906 (Ossining Justice Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 544, 43 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolin-v-perlco-venetian-blind-corp-nyappterm-1943.