Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp.

180 Misc. 544, 43 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2182

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 18, 1943·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted, with ten dollars costs to plaintiff to abide the event. In view of the testimony of plaintiff that defendants’ officer requested plaintiff to come and collect his [545] wages on the day he quit, plaintiff made out a prima facie case of a hiring at will. If the hiring was at will, plaintiff can recover for the time he actually worked. However, if he agreed to work for a week and quit without justification, he cannot recover. No opinion.

MacCrate, Smith and McCooey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted, with ten dollars costs to plaintiff to abide the event. In view of the testimony of plaintiff that defendants’ officer requested plaintiff to come and collect his [545] wages on the day he quit, plaintiff made out a prima facie case of a hiring at will. If the hiring was at will, plaintiff can recover for the time he actually worked. However, if he agreed to work for a week and quit without justification, he cannot recover. No opinion.

MacCrate, Smith and McCooey, JJ., concur.

Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp., 180 Misc. 544, 43 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

180 Misc. 544 (Wolin v. Perlco Venetian Blind Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related