Wolfson v. Menardo

573 A.2d 390, 1990 Me. LEXIS 132
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided April 27, 1990·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the defendants failed to appear at trial in the District Court (Bidde-ford, MacNichol, J.), we agree with the Superior Court (York County, Brodrick, J.) that they cannot later argue that they were not the proper parties to the lawsuit. Nor can the defendants raise for the first time on appeal their arguments that the amount billed them was unfair, that they should have been allotted a setoff for late delivery or that they believed that the trial would be postponed. The defendants should have presented all those arguments to the District Court. See Blanchette v. York Mut. Ins. Co., 455 A.2d 426, 428 (Me.1983). Since this appeal is clearly frivolous, we award treble costs to the appellee under M.R.Civ.P. 76(f). See Gurschick v. Clark, 511 A.2d 36 (Me.1986).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed. Treble costs shall be paid by appellants Anthony Menardo and Sal DeVito to appellee Donna 0. Wolf-son.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolfson v. Menardo, 573 A.2d 390, 1990 Me. LEXIS 132 (Me. 1990).

573 A.2d 390 (Wolfson v. Menardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blanchette v. York Mutual Insurance
455 A.2d 426 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1983)
Gurschick v. Clark
511 A.2d 36 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)