Wolfson v. Litton Industries, Inc.

Second Circuit

Wolfson v. Litton Industries, Inc.

455 F.2d 519, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6388

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided December 28, 1971·No. No. 245, Docket 71-1576·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on Judge Palmieri’s opinion below, 336 F.Supp. 1039, granting summary judgment to the defendants, and add only a brief comment.

In this appeal Wolf son has relied heavily on the point that Judge Palmieri [520]*520failed to deal specifically with an alleged fraud in the inducement of a January 10, 1969 contract between the parties. But Wolfson had made only incidental and somewhat vague references to this allegation in his lengthy complaint and did not present the issue in the trial court as one having any substance. We are satisfied that Judge Palmieri considered and correctly resolved the claim and properly concluded that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on Judge Palmieri’s opinion below, 336 F.Supp. 1039, granting summary judgment to the defendants, and add only a brief comment.

In this appeal Wolf son has relied heavily on the point that Judge Palmieri [520]*520failed to deal specifically with an alleged fraud in the inducement of a January 10, 1969 contract between the parties. But Wolfson had made only incidental and somewhat vague references to this allegation in his lengthy complaint and did not present the issue in the trial court as one having any substance. We are satisfied that Judge Palmieri considered and correctly resolved the claim and properly concluded that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact.

Wolfson v. Litton Industries, Inc., 455 F.2d 519, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6388 (2d Cir. 1971).

Pincite

455 F.2d 519 (Wolfson v. Litton Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related