Wolfson v. Darnell
187 N.E.2d 133, 12 N.Y.2d 819
Opinion
Appeal from that part of the judgment which reversed the judgment against defendant-respondent Rosen and dismissed the complaint as to her dismissed, with costs to defendant-respondent Rosen, upon the ground that defendant-appellant is not an aggrieved party (see, e.g., Nekris v. Yellen, 302 N. Y. 626; Ward v. Iroquois Gas Corp., 258 N. Y. 124, 129), and, in all other respects, judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs-respondents. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wolfson v. Darnell, 187 N.E.2d 133, 12 N.Y.2d 819 (N.Y. 1962).
187 N.E.2d 133 (Wolfson v. Darnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mattis-Loguiratto v. Romano
222 A.D.2d 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Wright v. Morozinis
220 A.D.2d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Gouchie v. Gill
198 A.D.2d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Tenenbaum v. Martin
131 A.D.2d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
North Shore Hospital v. Martin
344 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)