Wolfsohn v. Raab

E.D. Pennsylvania

Wolfsohn v. Raab

11 F.R.D. 254, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3598

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 1, 1951

DocketCiv. No. 11728

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 11 F.R.D. 254 (Wolfsohn v. Raab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolfsohn v. Raab, 11 F.R.D. 254, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3598 (E.D. Pa. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

McGRANERY, District Judge.

Defendant moves to vacate a default judgment, under Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. It appears that the defendant, a resident of Florida, had been served with a summons and complaint while in Philadelphia on business, on December 15, 1950. Upon his return to Florida, on or about December 25, he turned the summons and complaint over to his Florida attorney, who, on December 28, forwarded the papers to a Philadelphia correspondent, who returned them by mail on December 30, advising he would not represent defendant. The papers arrived from Philadelphia on January 3, whereupon the Florida counsel immediately telephoned another attorney in Philadelphia who- did undertake to represent the defendant. The summons and complaint were forwarded to him by air mail, with an analysis of the plaintiff’s claim and the defense to' be prepared. On January 4, the last day to answer, defendant’s Philadelphia counsel prepared certain motions but, owing to' a miscalculation of the time by Florida counsel, as well as by himself, he neglected to file them until January 5. On that day, a default judgment was entered.

[255]*255Permission to plead after the allotted time, under Rule 60(b), is a matter for the discretion of the trial judge, Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp., 3 Cir., 130 F.2d 185. The delay was a matter of only one day. It was the result of mistakes in time calculation made by both Florida and Philadelphia counsel of the defendant. The plaintiff’s claim is a substantial one «nd the defendant sets up a meritorious defense. According the defendant his'day in court will work no prejudice to the plaintiff and will be in the interest of justice. “ * * * [Discretion to avert injustice because of mistake or inadvertence of counsel should not be confined, and by the rule cited is not confined, by arbitrary limitations.” La Barbera v. Grubard, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 738, 739.

The default judgment, therefore, will be set aside.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGRANERY, District Judge.

Defendant moves to vacate a default judgment, under Rule 60(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. It appears that the defendant, a resident of Florida, had been served with a summons and complaint while in Philadelphia on business, on December 15, 1950. Upon his return to Florida, on or about December 25, he turned the summons and complaint over to his Florida attorney, who, on December 28, forwarded the papers to a Philadelphia correspondent, who returned them by mail on December 30, advising he would not represent defendant. The papers arrived from Philadelphia on January 3, whereupon the Florida counsel immediately telephoned another attorney in Philadelphia who- did undertake to represent the defendant. The summons and complaint were forwarded to him by air mail, with an analysis of the plaintiff’s claim and the defense to' be prepared. On January 4, the last day to answer, defendant’s Philadelphia counsel prepared certain motions but, owing to' a miscalculation of the time by Florida counsel, as well as by himself, he neglected to file them until January 5. On that day, a default judgment was entered.

[255]*255Permission to plead after the allotted time, under Rule 60(b), is a matter for the discretion of the trial judge, Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp., 3 Cir., 130 F.2d 185. The delay was a matter of only one day. It was the result of mistakes in time calculation made by both Florida and Philadelphia counsel of the defendant. The plaintiff’s claim is a substantial one «nd the defendant sets up a meritorious defense. According the defendant his'day in court will work no prejudice to the plaintiff and will be in the interest of justice. “ * * * [Discretion to avert injustice because of mistake or inadvertence of counsel should not be confined, and by the rule cited is not confined, by arbitrary limitations.” La Barbera v. Grubard, 2 Cir., 112 F.2d 738, 739.

The default judgment, therefore, will be set aside.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 F.R.D. 254, 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfsohn-v-raab-paed-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack