Wolfram v. State
This text of 359 S.W.3d 565 (Wolfram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Cody Wolfram appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Wolfram claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel when counsel failed to call character witnesses on Wolfram’s behalf at his sentencing hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
359 S.W.3d 565, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 258, 2012 WL 612471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfram-v-state-moctapp-2012.