Wolfork v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wolfork v. State

103 S.E. 718, 25 Ga. App. 473, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 14

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 1920

Docket11514

StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 718 (Wolfork v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolfork v. State, 103 S.E. 718, 25 Ga. App. 473, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 14 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Under all the facts of the case, and especially the incriminatory admissions and conduct of the defendant after he was charged with the burglary, his conviction was fully authorized by the evidence.

In the light of the court’s charge, it was not error, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, to fail to charge specifically on the law of circumstantial evidence. See, in this connection, Shaneyfelt v. State, 24 Ga. App. 555 (3) (101 S. E. 592).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI