Wolford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wolford v. State

586 So. 2d 1195, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9377, 1991 WL 175222

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 12, 1991·No. No. 91-267·Published

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Appellant correctly urges on appeal that the sentence of “credit for time served” imposed on Count I of Case No. 89-79 was error and should be vacated because he has completely served the five year sentence imposed in that case. Appellant’s other issue on appeal is without merit. Ford v. State, 572 So.2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED in part; sentence VACATED in Case No. 89-79.

SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIFFIN, Judge.

Appellant correctly urges on appeal that the sentence of “credit for time served” imposed on Count I of Case No. 89-79 was error and should be vacated because he has completely served the five year sentence imposed in that case. Appellant’s other issue on appeal is without merit. Ford v. State, 572 So.2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED in part; sentence VACATED in Case No. 89-79.

SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Wolford v. State, 586 So. 2d 1195, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 9377, 1991 WL 175222 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

586 So. 2d 1195 (Wolford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related