Wolfman v. Corey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Wolfman v. Corey

155 N.E. 635, 258 Mass. 611, 1927 Mass. LEXIS 1129

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 10, 1927

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 155 N.E. 635 (Wolfman v. Corey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolfman v. Corey, 155 N.E. 635, 258 Mass. 611, 1927 Mass. LEXIS 1129 (Mass. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

This is a writ of entry. The Land Court found that “the demandant is entitled to immediate possession of the demanded premises and that the tenant is unlawfully withholding possession from him.” Judgment was ordered for the demandant. The recital of facts in the decision of the Land Court amply supports this finding. No evidence is reported. This appeal of the tenant raises no question of law, nor anything for the consideration of this court. Trojanowski v. MacLachlan, 240 Mass. 225, 227.

The tenant’s appeal from that decision was filed on November 3, 1926. Motion to dismiss that appeal was filed and allowed on December 6, 1926, on the ground that the appeal by the tenant had not been prosecuted and entered in this court as required by statute. No evidence is reported on this matter. There was no error in the dismissal of the appeal under numerous decisions. Griffin v. Griffin, 222 Mass. 218. Crawford v. Roloson, 254 Mass. 163, 167, and cases there collected.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This is a writ of entry. The Land Court found that “the demandant is entitled to immediate possession of the demanded premises and that the tenant is unlawfully withholding possession from him.” Judgment was ordered for the demandant. The recital of facts in the decision of the Land Court amply supports this finding. No evidence is reported. This appeal of the tenant raises no question of law, nor anything for the consideration of this court. Trojanowski v. MacLachlan, 240 Mass. 225, 227.

The tenant’s appeal from that decision was filed on November 3, 1926. Motion to dismiss that appeal was filed and allowed on December 6, 1926, on the ground that the appeal by the tenant had not been prosecuted and entered in this court as required by statute. No evidence is reported on this matter. There was no error in the dismissal of the appeal under numerous decisions. Griffin v. Griffin, 222 Mass. 218. Crawford v. Roloson, 254 Mass. 163, 167, and cases there collected.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 N.E. 635, 258 Mass. 611, 1927 Mass. LEXIS 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfman-v-corey-mass-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack