Wolfgang v. Dawsy
This text of Wolfgang v. Dawsy (Wolfgang v. Dawsy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
RENO WOLFGANG,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-1797
JEFFREY J. DAWSY, AS SHERIFF OF CITRUS COUNTY,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed December 2, 2016
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Patricia V. Thomas, Judge.
Reno Wolfgang, Punta Gorda, pro se.
R. Wesley Bradshaw, of Bradshaw & Mountjoy, P.A., Inverness, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Reno Wolfgang appeals the dismissal of his cause of action for replevin seeking
return of property seized during the course of a criminal investigation. We affirm. See
Pondella Hall For Hire, Inc. v. City of St. Cloud, 837 So. 2d 510, 511–12 (Fla. 5th DCA
2003) (concluding trial court correctly dismissed replevin action because it lacked
jurisdiction; cause of action must be brought in court with jurisdiction over the criminal proceedings (citing Eight Hundred Inc. v. State, 781 So. 2d 1187, 1190–91 (Fla. 5th DCA
2001))). 1
AFFIRMED.
SAWAYA, COHEN and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
1We note that the dismissal is without prejudice to Wolfgang pursuing his claim in the appropriate court. See Pondella Hall For Hire, Inc., 837 So. 2d at 512.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wolfgang v. Dawsy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfgang-v-dawsy-fladistctapp-2016.