Wolff v. Wolff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wolff v. Wolff

226 S.W.3d 898, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 957, 2007 WL 1814393

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2007·No. No. ED 88651·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The husband, Paul Wolff, appeals the judgment pendente lite entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, which inter alia found the antenuptial agreement between the husband and the wife, Deborah Wolff, to be invalid, unconscionable, and unenforceable and awarded the wife maintenance in the amount of $600 per month. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no error.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The husband, Paul Wolff, appeals the judgment pendente lite entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, which inter alia found the antenuptial agreement between the husband and the wife, Deborah Wolff, to be invalid, unconscionable, and unenforceable and awarded the wife maintenance in the amount of $600 per month. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no error.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Wolff v. Wolff, 226 S.W.3d 898, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 957, 2007 WL 1814393 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

226 S.W.3d 898 (Wolff v. Wolff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.