Wolff v. United States

116 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5080
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wolff v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 F. 1001
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided May 31, 1902·No. No. 2,865·Published

Opinion

LACOMBE, C. J.

(orally). The opinion of the board of general appraisers is very comprehensive, and deals with a large number of different articles, which the board finds should be assessed for duty, under paragraph 339 of the tariff act of 1897, as braids or trimmings. The evidence upon which findings of fact covering nearly all these articles are made is not before this court. The only article as to which exception is taken is represented by Exhibit 1, and the testimony taken in the circuit court shows plainly that it is commercially known as “tape,” and not as “braid” or “trimming.” It would, therefore, seem to be more correctly classified under paragraph 320 of the same act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolff v. United States, 116 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5080 (circtsdny 1902).

116 F. 1023 (Wolff v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.