Wolff v. Rice

Supreme Court

Wolff v. Rice

422 U.S. 1055, 95 S. Ct. 2677

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 30, 1975·No. No. 74-1222·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. In addition to those questions presented by the petition, counsel are requested to brief and argue the following question: Whether the constitutional validity of the entry and search of re[1056]*1056spondent’s premises by Omaha police officers under the circumstances of this case is a question properly cognizable under 28 U. S. C. § 2254. Reported below: 513 F. 2d 1280.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. In addition to those questions presented by the petition, counsel are requested to brief and argue the following question: Whether the constitutional validity of the entry and search of re[1056]*1056spondent’s premises by Omaha police officers under the circumstances of this case is a question properly cognizable under 28 U. S. C. § 2254. Reported below: 513 F. 2d 1280.

Wolff v. Rice, 422 U.S. 1055, 95 S. Ct. 2677 (1975).

Pincite

422 U.S. 1055 (Wolff v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related