Wolff v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wolff v. City of New York

262 A.D. 780, 29 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5827

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 26, 1941·Published

Opinion

Action by an assignee to recover upon a claim for services rendered as an inspector of elections. Plaintiff paid his assignor four dollars less for the claim than its face amount. Defendant alleged a violation of section 355 of the Banking Law. Order of the Appellate Term, reversing on the law a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, for plaintiff, and dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. [175 Misc. 569.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by an assignee to recover upon a claim for services rendered as an inspector of elections. Plaintiff paid his assignor four dollars less for the claim than its face amount. Defendant alleged a violation of section 355 of the Banking Law. Order of the Appellate Term, reversing on the law a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, for plaintiff, and dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. [175 Misc. 569.]

Wolff v. City of New York, 262 A.D. 780, 29 N.Y.S.2d 148, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 780 (Wolff v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related