Wolff v. Carter

33 Tex. 699
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1871
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Tex. 699 (Wolff v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolff v. Carter, 33 Tex. 699 (Tex. 1871).

Opinion

Ogden, J.

Appellant, as-administrator de bonis non on the estate of R. Deacon, deceased, appealed from the judgment and decree of the County Court of Dallas county, sitting for probate purposes, to the district court, and on motion of appellee in the district court, the appeal to that court was dismissed, because the administrator had failed to execute a bond for cost; and from the judgment of the district court, dismissing the appeal, he as administrator has appealed to this court. It has often been decided by this court, that an administrator may appeal without bond or security for cost. (Battle v. Howard, 13 Texas, 345; Duggan [700]*700v. Noell, 30 Tex., 451.) It was therefore error in the court below in dismissing the appeal in this cause for the want of security for cost. The judgment is therefore reversed and remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Battle v. Howard
13 Tex. 345 (Texas Supreme Court, 1855)
Duggan v. Noell
30 Tex. 451 (Texas Supreme Court, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Tex. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolff-v-carter-tex-1871.