Wolff v. Brewster Central School District

10 A.D.3d 661, 781 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10792
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 13, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 A.D.3d 661 (Wolff v. Brewster Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolff v. Brewster Central School District, 10 A.D.3d 661, 781 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), entered June [662]*66210, 2003, as upon renewal and reargument, adhered to a prior determination in an order of the same court dated January 8, 2003, denying their application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Most of the issues raised on this appeal could have been raised on the petitioners’ prior appeal from the order dated January 8, 2003, denying their application for leave to serve a late notice of claim. That appeal was dismissed by this Court for lack of prosecution. The dismissal of that appeal constituted an adjudication on the merits with respect to all issues which could have been raised, and we decline to review those issues on this appeal (see Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 93 NY2d 750 [1999]; Bray v Cox, 38 NY2d 350 [1976]; Brosnan v Behette, 243 AD2d 524 [1997]).

The petitioners’ contentions based on Education Law § 1125 et seq., which are reviewed on this appeal, are without merit. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Schmidt, Cozier and Skelos, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Silvestre v. Shelley
30 A.D.3d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Lang v. Dachs
22 A.D.3d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 A.D.3d 661, 781 N.Y.S.2d 620, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolff-v-brewster-central-school-district-nyappdiv-2004.