Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States

22 Ct. Int'l Trade 445
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1038
United States Court of International Trade·Decided May 6, 1998·No. Court No. 92-08-00557·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:

In accordance with the decision (Apr. 14, 1998) and mandate (Apr. 29,1998) of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal Nos. 97-1049,-1079, holding that the injunctions issued in Volume Footwear Retailers of Am. v. United States, 10 CIT 12 (1986), properly enjoined the liquidation by the U.S. Customs Service of “all entries of non-rubber footwear from Spain” covered by the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s 1980-82 reviews, including plaintiffs entries, it is hereby

Ordered that the portion of the Court’s decision in Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States, 20 CIT 1038, 936 F. Supp. 1084 (1996), holding that the injunctions issued in Volume Footwear, did not suspend liquidation of plaintiffs entries under 19 U.S.C. § 1504(d) is vacated; and it is further

Ordered that plaintiff is not entitled to a refund with respect to the countervailing duties paid in connection with plaintiffs Schedule II entries; and it is further

Ordered that this case is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States, 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 445 (cit 1998).

22 Ct. Int'l Trade 445 (Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States
20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1038 (Court of International Trade, 1996)