Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States

22 Ct. Int'l Trade 445

CourtUnited States Court of International Trade

DecidedMay 6, 1998

DocketCourt No. 92-08-00557

StatusPublished

This text of 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 445 (Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States, 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 445 (cit 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:

In accordance with the decision (Apr. 14, 1998) and mandate (Apr. 29,1998) of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal Nos. 97-1049,-1079, holding that the injunctions issued in Volume Footwear Retailers of Am. v. United States, 10 CIT 12 (1986), properly enjoined the liquidation by the U.S. Customs Service of “all entries of non-rubber footwear from Spain” covered by the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s 1980-82 reviews, including plaintiffs entries, it is hereby

Ordered that the portion of the Court’s decision in Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States, 20 CIT 1038, 936 F. Supp. 1084 (1996), holding that the injunctions issued in Volume Footwear, did not suspend liquidation of plaintiffs entries under 19 U.S.C. § 1504(d) is vacated; and it is further

Ordered that plaintiff is not entitled to a refund with respect to the countervailing duties paid in connection with plaintiffs Schedule II entries; and it is further

Ordered that this case is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

Tsoucalas, Senior Judge:

In accordance with the decision (Apr. 14, 1998) and mandate (Apr. 29,1998) of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal Nos. 97-1049,-1079, holding that the injunctions issued in Volume Footwear Retailers of Am. v. United States, 10 CIT 12 (1986), properly enjoined the liquidation by the U.S. Customs Service of “all entries of non-rubber footwear from Spain” covered by the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s 1980-82 reviews, including plaintiffs entries, it is hereby

Ordered that the portion of the Court’s decision in Wolff Shoe Co. v. United States, 20 CIT 1038, 936 F. Supp. 1084 (1996), holding that the injunctions issued in Volume Footwear, did not suspend liquidation of plaintiffs entries under 19 U.S.C. § 1504(d) is vacated; and it is further

Ordered that plaintiff is not entitled to a refund with respect to the countervailing duties paid in connection with plaintiffs Schedule II entries; and it is further

Ordered that this case is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Ct. Int'l Trade 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolff-shoe-co-v-united-states-cit-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack