Wolff Co. v. Pierce

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Wolff Co. v. Pierce

126 So. 744, 12 La. App. 604, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 63

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 24, 1930

DocketNo. 13,270

StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 744 (Wolff Co. v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wolff Co. v. Pierce, 126 So. 744, 12 La. App. 604, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 63 (La. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

WESTERFIELD, J.

This is a suit growing out of an intersectional collision of two vehicles. The owner of each of the automobiles claims from the other the amount of damages sustained by his car. In holding that neither plaintiff nor defendant could recover, the trial judge evidently reached the conclusion that the drivers of both vehicles were at fault.

After reading the record, we are unable to say that the court a qua erred in its finding, and, for that reason, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WESTERFIELD, J.

This is a suit growing out of an intersectional collision of two vehicles. The owner of each of the automobiles claims from the other the amount of damages sustained by his car. In holding that neither plaintiff nor defendant could recover, the trial judge evidently reached the conclusion that the drivers of both vehicles were at fault.

After reading the record, we are unable to say that the court a qua erred in its finding, and, for that reason, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 So. 744, 12 La. App. 604, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolff-co-v-pierce-lactapp-1930.