Wolfe v. State of Florida

116 So. 72, 95 Fla. 115
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 5, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs in error were indicted, tried and convicted in Lake County, Florida, as principals in the second degree to the crime of robbery.

On careful analysis of the record we do not think the verdict in this case accords with the manifest weight of the evidence or with the justice of the cause, so the judgment will be and is hereby reversed and a new trial awarded. Ming v. State, 89 Fla. 280, 103 South. Rep. 618.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Elias, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wolfe v. State of Florida, 116 So. 72, 95 Fla. 115 (Fla. 1928).

116 So. 72 (Wolfe v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padgett v. State
170 So. 175 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)