Wolfe v. State of Florida

116 So. 72, 95 Fla. 115
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 5, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 116 So. 72 (Wolfe v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wolfe v. State of Florida, 116 So. 72, 95 Fla. 115 (Fla. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs in error were indicted, tried and convicted in Lake County, Florida, as principals in the second degree to the crime of robbery.

On careful analysis of the record we do not think the verdict in this case accords with the manifest weight of the evidence or with the justice of the cause, so the judgment will be and is hereby reversed and a new trial awarded. Ming v. State, 89 Fla. 280, 103 South. Rep. 618.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Elias, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padgett v. State
170 So. 175 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 So. 72, 95 Fla. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wolfe-v-state-of-florida-fla-1928.